blader/humanizer
CLAUDE WRITING HABITS
Claude humanizer: 8 tells to fix and how to rewrite them
Claude writes clean drafts with a recognizable accent. These are the habits researchers and Wikipedia editors have documented, with rewrites, a checklist and an honest look at what humanizer tools can and can't do.
Today
MacBook Pro
PASTED FROM CLAUDE
SCANNING
PASTED FROM CLAUDE
SCANNING
Short answer
WHAT GIVES IT AWAY
What makes Claude's writing sound like AI?
Eight habits with a source behind each one. The before and after lines are short examples we wrote to show the fix.
TRY IT
Tap a line to rewrite the tell
The eight Claude-style examples from the cards below, stacked into one draft. Every rewrite is the one we show on its card.
TELLS FIXED
0 of 8
- Em dashes as glue
- 'Not X, it's Y'
- 'Less X, more Y'
- Stacked superlatives
- Hedged openers
- Inflated vocabulary
- Chat leftovers
- Summary closers
- TELL 01
Em dashes as glue
Example we wrote
Claude-style
The draft was ready — or so we thought — until the client called.
Rewritten
The draft was ready, or so we thought. Then the client called.
- TELL 02
'Not X, it's Y'
Wikipedia lists negative parallelisms as a classic sign. When PCWorld had Claude audit a writer's habits, "it's not just this; it's that" made the list.Example we wrote
Claude-style
This isn't just a budgeting app. It's a new way to think about money.
Rewritten
The app shows where your money went last month, sorted by how much you regret it.
- TELL 03
'Less X, more Y'
Graphite measured "less X, more Y" comparisons in Claude Opus 5 at 82 times the human rate, and "rather than merely" at 160 times.Example we wrote
Claude-style
Think of onboarding less like a checklist and more like a conversation.
Rewritten
Skip the checklist on day one. Ask the new hire what they want to learn first.
- TELL 04
Stacked superlatives
Graphite found 'single most' and 'arguably the most' in Claude but never in GPT-6 Astra, and 'every single' at 112 times Astra's rate.Example we wrote
Claude-style
This is arguably the single most important step in the entire process.
Rewritten
Do this step first. The next three depend on it.
- TELL 05
Hedged openers
"It's worth noting" openers were another habit Claude flagged in PCWorld's test. Hedges that point at no real doubt read as filler.Example we wrote
Claude-style
It's worth noting that results may vary depending on a number of factors.
Rewritten
Large files take longer, and slow Wi-Fi makes it worse.
- TELL 06
Inflated vocabulary
Delve, pivotal, underscore, tapestry and testament all sit on Wikipedia's words-to-watch list, along with "serves as" and "boasts" where "is" and "has" would do.Example we wrote
Claude-style
The launch underscores the team's pivotal role in a rich tapestry of innovation.
Rewritten
The launch shows the team can ship on time.
- TELL 07
Chat leftovers
A Claude Code GitHub issue titled "Claude says 'You're absolutely right!' about everything" drew 870 thumbs-up. Praise and sign-offs from the chat don't belong in a final draft.Example we wrote
Claude-style
Great question! Here's a clear breakdown of the key points. I hope this helps!
Rewritten
Three things changed in the new contract.
- TELL 08
Summary closers
Wikipedia flags formulaic endings such as 'Despite these challenges' wrap-ups. Claude often ends by restating what the reader just finished reading.Example we wrote
Claude-style
Ultimately, by following these steps, you'll be well on your way to success.
Rewritten
Send the invoice the same day you finish the job.
MEASURED, NOT GUESSED
Is Claude's style getting easier or harder to spot?
Graphite compared 90,000 AI articles from nine models with 10,000 human articles on the same topics. Claude is moving, slowly, toward human writing.
CLAUDE OPUS 5 VERSUS HUMAN WRITERS
How far each habit runs past the human rate
Graphite's multiples on a log scale, so the small ones still show. 1x is how often human writers do it.
- "Rather than merely"160x
- "Less X, more Y" comparisons82x
- Mannered prose2.5x
- Em dashesabout 1x
TELL COUNT
-0%
Claude's earliest to latest model tested
MANNERED PROSE
+0%
since Opus 4, even as word choice moved closer to human
Graphite found Claude Opus 5's overall word choice closer to human writing than Opus 4's, while GPT-6 Astra moved further away. Claude's mannered prose score still rose 19% since Opus 4, so habits shift more than they disappear.
Because 65% of tells are tied to one model family, a list built from ChatGPT habits misses a lot of Claude's. That's why this page sticks to Claude-specific sources.
FIRST PASS IN SECONDS
Let a different model take the first pass.
ClaudeClean rewrites with OpenAI, not Claude, in Light, Medium or Strong passes, and shows every change in a diff. Em dashes go unless you tick Keep em dashes. Then do the hand edit below.
- 300 rewrite credits a month
- 20,000 characters per request
- .txt, .docx and .pdf files
THE HAND EDIT
How do you humanize Claude text by hand?
Ten passes, in this order. The first seven remove habits; the last three add the voice a draft is missing.
WATCH THE PASSES
One short post, ten passes
A Claude-style draft we wrote, edited in checklist order. Tap any pass to jump to it.
Onboarding post
Pasted from Claude
Great question! Here's a quick overview of our new onboarding.
Key takeaway: our onboarding isn't just a checklist — it's a conversation.
It underscores our pivotal commitment to every new hire.
It's fast, simple, and friendly.
It's worth noting that results may vary.
In conclusion, great onboarding sets everyone up for success.
- 01
Read it out loud once
Your ear catches the sing-song rhythm faster than your eye. Mark every line you'd never say to a friend. - 02
Cut the opener and the closer
Delete warm-up lines and the final paragraph that restates everything. Start at the first useful sentence and stop after the last one. - 03
Fix the em dashes case by case
Keep one if it earns its place. Turn the rest into commas, periods or parentheses, whichever matches the pause you want. - 04
Flatten 'not X, it's Y' lines
If nobody claimed X, just state Y. Corrective framing makes the reader feel argued with for no reason. - 05
Swap the inflated words
Delve, pivotal, underscore, tapestry, testament and showcase are on Wikipedia's watch list. Use the plain word you'd say out loud. - 06
Break up lists of three
Claude likes three adjectives or three short phrases in a row. Keep the one that matters, or give a real example instead. - 07
Delete empty hedges
'It's worth noting' and 'results may vary' rarely add anything. Keep a hedge only when you'd name the real reason for doubt. - 08
Add one thing only you know
A name, a number from your own work, a mistake you made. Specifics are what generic drafts can't supply. - 09
Vary the sentence length
Mix a short line with a longer one. Uniform medium sentences are part of what makes AI prose feel flat. - 10
Strip the chat formatting
Bold lead-ins, headers on a short answer and title-case bullets come from chat replies. Turn them back into sentences for emails and posts.
FOUR WAYS TO DO IT
Which Claude humanizer method should you pick?
Each method trades effort against control. None of them comes with a detector promise.
WHO PICKS THE FINAL WORDS
Same draft in, different hands on the words
Pick a method from the table below to see which model chooses the wording that ships.
CHANGES CLAUDE'S WORD PATTERN?
Only the words you change; Anthropic says light edits probably leave the watermark
| Method | Changes Claude's word pattern? | Keeps meaning? | Cost | Effort |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual edit | Only the words you change; Anthropic says light edits probably leave the watermark | Yes, you control every line | Free | High, every line is yours to check |
| Prompt Claude to restyle | No; the new draft is fresh Claude output and carries the watermark | Usually; check facts it may smooth over | Your Claude plan | Low, if the prompt is specific |
| Generic humanizer tools | Depends on the model behind it, which many don't name | Varies; read every sentence before using it | Free tiers to monthly plans | Low, plus a careful read |
| ClaudeClean rewriteFastest | New wording comes from OpenAI, not Claude; how much changes depends on the pass | Shown in a before and after diff | 2,000 characters free; Pro $5/mo for 300 credits | Low, then review the diff |
Swipe to compare →
1 credit is about 1,000 characters. Light and Medium cost 1x, Strong costs 2x. Rewriting is best effort, and you should still finish with a hand edit.
BEFORE YOU EVEN EDIT
How do you prompt Claude to sound less like AI?
Anthropic's own prompting guide has the two tips that matter most. The rest come from writers who audited Claude's output.
Do this
- Say what to do. Anthropic's guide says to tell Claude what to do instead of what not to do, for example asking for smoothly flowing prose paragraphs.
- Match your prompt to the output. Anthropic notes that removing markdown from your prompt can reduce markdown in the reply.
- Paste a sample of your writing. A few paragraphs you wrote give it rhythm and word choice to copy.
- Name the habits and the swap. "Use commas or periods where you'd use an em dash" works better than a ban list alone.
- Ask for an audit pass. Have Claude list its own tells in the draft, then fix them yourself, like PCWorld's test.
Skip this
- "Write like a human." Too vague to change anything specific.
- Ban lists with no alternative. Long lists of don'ts leave Claude guessing what you want.
- Pasting tool output unread. Humanizer tools can change meaning, and you sign the result.
- Expecting a clean detector score. Classifiers and watermarks measure different things, and both can be wrong.
- Dropping a required disclosure. If your school or job asks you to disclose AI help, editing for style doesn't change that.
BUILD THE PROMPT
Turn the tips into a prompt you can paste
Tick the tips you want. The wording is ours, built from the Do this list above; fill in the brackets.
Write a short blog post about [your topic] for [your reader]. Write in smoothly flowing prose paragraphs, the way you'd explain this to a colleague. Here are a few paragraphs I wrote. Copy their rhythm and word choice: [paste your sample here] Use commas or periods where you'd use an em dash. If nobody claimed the opposite, state the point directly instead of saying what it isn't.
Read the full Claude prompting best practices for format control, and PCWorld's write-up for an example of Claude ranking a writer's own AI-sounding habits.
SKILLS AND BOTS
Is there a Claude humanizer skill?
Yes. The most popular one is open source, built from Wikipedia's list, and refreshingly honest about detectors.
Source list
Built on Wikipedia's guide
A skill keeps the edit inside Claude, so the rewrite is still Claude output. That's fine for voice, and it's a different job from changing which model picked the words.
Humanizer edits for human readers. Getting past AI detectors is not a goal, and detectors still flag most of its output.
USE IT RIGHT
Is it OK to humanize Claude text?
Editing for voice is ordinary writing work. Hiding AI use where a rule requires disclosure is a different thing.
Disclosure beats disguise
Detectors
Humanizer output gets flagged
Watermark
Style and watermark are separate
Quality
The real goal is better writing
CLAUDECLEAN REWRITE
Clean the characters, then rewrite with a non-Claude model.
Paste a Claude draft, clear hidden characters in your browser, and run an optional OpenAI rewrite with a diff. No detector result is promised.
> source text
Paste the Claude draft
Text or a .txt, .docx or .pdf file. ClaudeClean doesn't store what you paste.
scan report
3 zero-width1 soft hyphencleanable signals2Clear hidden characters
Zero-width spaces, soft hyphens and lookalike letters are found and cleaned locally, before any rewrite.
before → after
clearusefulanswerfocusedhelpfulresponse
Copied ✓Rewrite and review
Pick Light, Medium or Strong, up to three passes. The diff shows dropped em dashes, hedges and summary closers.
PRICING
Clean the text free. Rewrite more with Pro.
The scan and hidden-character cleanup are free. Pro adds room for rewrites and files.
CLAUDECLEAN PRO
ClaudeClean Pro
Cancel anytime.
- 300 credits every month (≈300,000 characters of rewriting)
- 20,000 characters per request
- Clean .txt, .docx and .pdf files
- Light / medium / strong intensity
- Dashboard with history
Free: 10 credits a month with an account, or try 2,000 characters right here without one. Strong rewrites cost 2× credits.
WHERE THE TELLS COME FROM
Research behind this Claude humanizer guide
Each habit above traces back to one of these. The examples are ours; the patterns are theirs.
Wikipedia
Signs of AI writing
The editor-maintained field guide: words to watch, negative parallelisms, rule of three, em dashes.
View sourceGraphite
AI Tells
September 2026 study of 90,000 AI articles from nine models, with Claude Opus 5 numbers.
View sourceThe Economist
How to spot AI writing
July 2026: only Claude used em dashes more than professional writers.
View sourceAnthropic
Claude prompting best practices
Say what to do instead of what not to do, and match prompt style to the output.
View sourceGitHub
blader/humanizer
The open-source humanizer skill and its stated stance on AI detectors.
View sourcePCWorld
Claude ranked my AI-sounding habits
A writer has Claude audit their prose for em dashes, hedges and 'not just this' lines.
View sourceAlso cited: the Claude Code sycophancy issue and The Register's coverage of it.
WATCH
Using Wikipedia's AI list on Claude's own output
Chris Bradley walks through why Claude ignores 'don't sound like AI' and how to feed it Wikipedia's patterns instead.
FAQ